Easy to use with one caveat

So, it’s a one-trick pony, and that’s OK, as It does it well, and fast. You’ll want to create a folder of the only work you want to lapse. I did run into a few issues, and one was my fault. In my selected folder I named items image1, rather than image01, so the first nine frames were actually out of order when processed due to the missing leading (zero). The other issue is that Zeitraffer doesn’t automatically recalculate aspect if you change x or y. You’ll need to calculate that beforehand, otherwise your output will be stretched (or squeezed). But it’s easy to master, and fast to output, so I can easily recommend.

eldirtboy about Zeitraffer, v1.1